![]() Cropping a picture to the correct dimensions The OG Image should give people on social media a preview of what thy will see if they click the link. If you have a photo on hand, use Kapwing's free OG Image Maker to resize your image to fit the OG Image area.Ī good OG image is relevant to the page content, " click-worthy" to catch people's eyes in a social media feed, and branded to match the webpage's brand, business, or persona. The recommended pixel dimensions of 1200:630 px (aspect ratio of 1.91:1). OG Image Size: The recommended size for an OG Image is 1.91:1. ![]() OG Images are the first thing viewers will see when your webpage is shared on social media. If you regularly post on a personal or company blog, or share posts to social platforms like Facebook, Reddit, or LinkedIn, you’re probably familiar with “ OG Images,” or open graph image meta tags, which accompany your article or webpage wherever it is embedded online. This article will show you a few ways to format your OG images in under a minute. ![]() Whatever.OG Images look like they fit an aspect ratio very close to 16:9, but their dimensions are actually about 1.91:1 – 1200:630 is recommended. But if this EXIF:FocalLengthin35mmFocalLength field is left empty in your editor, SmugMug will still include the "equivalent 35mm focal length" (same value) which is either a clue you used a full frame camera (who cares?), or SmugMug's assumption is that every file uploaded came from a crop-image camera. SmugMug seems to include "equivalent 35mm focal length" (in parentheses) for every lens? If the file comes from a digital camera, SmugMug somehow knows what its so-called "crop-factor" is, if it has one. (This has nothing to do with the aperture used.) There are additional EXIF lens fields but they're ignored by SmugMug. SmugMug will pick up either field, but not both. It may or may not display either however, but you can combine brand and model into just one of the fields and SmugMug will show it as expected.įor SmugMug to display both lens make and model use either the EXIF:LensModel or the XMP:Lens fields (whatever that may be called in your editor ) and combine brand name and model into just that one field. numerical values, location city and so on) are example values.įor camera name info, SmugMug will pick up both EXIF:Make or EXIF:Model fields (whatever that may be called in your editor ). Here's a new sample image, with some various EXIF/IPTC/XMP field names entered as values (where possible). (I'll have soon deleted or edited the same image in the link above.) If SmugMug ever decides to publish which fields it pays attention to and displays on a picture page from it, please let us know. You (me, the user) needs to know which fields to use, and what they're called in the 3rd party editor, because SmugMug ignores some of them, and because there's some overlap between EXIF, IPTC, XMP sets._ In other words, even if I used ExifTool to add metadata, I'd still need to know which fields to populate for SmugMug to see it._įor some closure on this, I may post a link later to a Google Docs spreadsheet I'm building that might help others. For example, it seems SmugMug will show in its "Camera" field values entered in either EXIF:Make or EXIF:Model (and in both cases you have to combine the brand name and model name into the same field, because SmugMug won't display them separately.) This is important, because many situations will display values for "either" field. Some strangeness remains but it might be due to some fields in my editor taking precedence over others when there are competing fields entered. Most of it "came over" just fine to SmugMug, including most of the fields mentioned above. I took another sample image and loaded it up with a bunch of metadata, using text or other relevant values I could track back to what and where I entered it in MetaImage. I can't be the only film shooter here, uploading digital images that originate from a scanner, or from an image editor and not from a camera. I searched for "metadata" here but the info is remarkably sparse, as if Smugmug expects users to either only edit images within Smugmug's limited fields, or just accept whatever comes in comes in. The bigger issue is that unless I stumble onto which fields Smugmug may or may not pick up, it would be helpful for a Smugmug engineer to step forward with a list of which EXIF or IPTC or XMP or ICC fields are respected and displayed on the site. I'd be totally OK with including the manufacturer within the Lens Model field as a workaround for the brand name there.īut we're spinning our wheels here. I could use specific city or state fields within IPTC instead but I don't know if Smugmug picks that up, either. GPS coordinates (normally translates into city, state etc. No, it's more than just the brand of the camera and the camera model name.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |